Support the fundamentalists. This rule has never been questioned and was brought out at Nuremberg, and in by the ICC. Look where it is now. Merely serve US interest and get a free pass for violence. The secret of Humanitarian intervention aside from the fact that it rarely is Humanitarian is that it runs only one way - from the strong to the weak.
- Deficit Irrigation Practices (Water Reports,)!
- How America Gets Away with Murder: Illegal Wars, Collateral Damage and Crimes Against Humanity;
- The Terrible Two (The Terrible Two, Book 1);
- Remembering Michael Mandel - rowsmillfuncdeword.tk?
- War Crimes - Resources in Connexions Social Justice Library.
- The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Asian American Literature.
- OS X El Capitan: The Missing Manual.
Rogue states such as ours by nature need to marginalize world opinion. The system of International law and the UN were created to protect countries from bad guys like Hitler.
International law and the UN today have been disconnected by the US because if the laws of world apply to us, we will have to abide by them. And so as the title suggests, instead we are getting away with murder. Especially when you consider that there would have been no Holocaust if the world had stood up for international law and national sovereignty in But now the US also constantly violates Articles 48 and 51, the most important rules of the Protocols.
Mandel shows us the dirty secret Curtis LeMay knew: only lost wars are crimes. Imagine putting the Japanese on trial with a straight face after we incinerated over , humans one night in Tokyo alone with firebombs knowing the outcome before the first bomb dropped. As we see today with white-collar crime, punishments for criminals of the state then Nuremberg and Tokyo and now rarely fit the crime. Brilliant important book… Oct 20, Paul Rhodes rated it really liked it. Geri really should read this book. She might learn that her God, the United States of America, is a lying, criminal, murderous piece of shit.
Jun 20, Khristine Babylonia rated it it was amazing. View 1 comment. Jake rated it really liked it Mar 28, Nigar rated it liked it Apr 20, Diana Morokhovets rated it really liked it Oct 12, Jen rated it really liked it Jan 21, Oliver Sanderson-nichols rated it liked it Jan 02, Simon Wood rated it it was amazing Feb 11, Garaged Valdez rated it it was ok Oct 18, Bob Kimble rated it really liked it Feb 20, Isaac rated it really liked it Aug 11, Mookie rated it really liked it Jul 01, Ben White rated it really liked it Mar 11, Gil Espinola rated it did not like it May 08, Mohammed Hamdy rated it it was amazing Mar 30, Rodney Ulyate marked it as to-read Jul 09, Iraqi lawyers have demanded that Bush and Blair be charged as war criminals.
According to a March 23 story on www. The Nuremburg Tribunal that prosecuted Nazi leaders described a war of aggression as the "supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole". If you break into someone's house and hold them at gunpoint and they try to kill you but you kill them first, they're guilty of nothing and you're guilty of murder. Human Rights Watch alleged in a report, The Road to Abu Ghraib, that the Bush administration has "effectively sought to re-write the Geneva Conventions of to eviscerate their most important protections".
Those include freedom from humiliating and degrading treatment, as well as from torture. Charles Gittings, a Washington state computer programmer, has filed three "amicus curaie" friend of the courts briefs in U. During a recent visit to Vancouver, Gittings told the Straight that he thinks the Bush administration deliberately set out to do an end run around the Geneva Conventions following the September 11 attacks. He cited a November 13, , presidential military order, which gave Rumsfeld wide latitude in dealing with detainees. Gittings has alleged that the treatment of detainees violates a U.
The law carries the death penalty.
your product Review
When Gittings was asked what his goal is in pursuing these cases, he replied: "George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, and everybody down the line in prison, serving probably life sentences for their crimes, actually. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to appoint an outside special counsel to investigate. Gonzales, as the former White House counsel, wrote a memo in January advising Bush that the Geneva Conventions didn't apply to enemy combatants in Afghanistan.
Gail Davidson isn't holding out much hope that Bush administration officials will ever be punished in the United States, but she doesn't rule out the possibility of it occurring elsewhere. She said there is certainly enough latitude under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act to prosecute senior Bush administration officials if they visit Canada after leaving office. However, charges under this act must be approved by the attorney general of Canada, Irwin Cotler. That was And we still aren't absolutely comfortable with somebody crying that the king is naked. According to the Canada's War Crimes Program annual report, the policy is unequivocal: "Canada will not be a safe haven for persons involved in war crimes, crimes against humanity or other reprehensible acts.
The annual report states that 2, persons complicit in war crimes or crimes against humanity have been prevented from entering Canada. Another were deported. This beautifully produced coffee-table book brings together over of Georgia Straight's iconic covers, along with short essays, insider details and contributor reflections, putting each of these issues of the publication into its historical context. Your mastery of top 40 lyrics was equal parts cringey and adorable.
Online purchase form
It'd be cool to see you Legacy Topics. Some lawyers claim the U. So far, none of them have been high-ranking officials in the Bush administration. Get the latests events and news updates. I may unsubscribe at any time. Not on your progressive life. Hold the Moment The Georgia Straight: A 50th Anniversary Celebration Book This beautifully produced coffee-table book brings together over of Georgia Straight's iconic covers, along with short essays, insider details and contributor reflections, putting each of these issues of the publication into its historical context.
Trailblazers Discover who's challenging the status quo in Vancouver. Education: Upgrade your skills for a dramatically new world. Over were killed and a hundred thousand forced to leave their homes while their houses were looted or destroyed. These crimes were committed in the course of a military operation, undoubtedly legitimate as such, aimed at re-taking the part of Croatian territory which was occupied by Serb forces. The operation was a success, and Croatians remember it as one of their finest hours. Gotovina was one of the commanders and, quite naturally, he is revered as a hero. The mere mention of the war crimes committed in the course of the operation was taboo for years.
The logic was: only enemy forces committed war crimes, defenders were innocent by definition. It is only recently that the government has acknowledged that, yes, crimes were committed, and those responsible for these crimes, including Gotovina, must be tried in The Hague. She never mentions that Krajina had been a UN protected area, like Srebrenica, brazenly violated by the Croatians in ; nor does she mention the May Operation Flash assault in which the Croats killed many hundreds of Serb civilians.
She doesn't mention the fact that the UN continued to urge a negotiated settlement of the Krajina dispute, ignored by the Croats in the massive attack of August She says that these crimes "were committed in the course of a military operation," but so were the Srebrenica crimes, and in fact Srebrenica was defended and abandoned by a military force relatively stronger than the Krajina Serbs had maintained.
Her statement that the Krajina operation was "legitimate" because it was "aimed at re-taking the part of Croatian territory which was occupied by Serb forces" gives this operation an apologetic context that involves serious lying-this was a carefully planned campaign, not mainly to remove "Serb forces"-relatively weak in Krajina and arguably there to defend a civilian population against Croatian army massacres such as occurred earlier at Medak and in Operation Flash-but to remove the Serb civilian population that had lived in that area for centuries.
This was deliberate ethnic cleansing, but Del Ponte cannot admit the fact in this case. Serb actions are invariably ethnic cleansing, Croatian actions of comparable or greater anti-civilian scope are merely "military operations," never ethnic cleansing, in accord with a clear political agenda. Further misrepresentations are her statement that "over were killed," and that "a hundred thousand" were "forced to leave their homes. The Serb human rights organization Veritas estimated that 1, civilians were killed in Operation Storm;  and their list of victims included women and children--the Croats didn't bus women and children to safety as did the genocidal Serbs at Srebrenica.
Operation Storm may well have involved the killing of more Serb civilians than Bosnian Muslim civilians killed in the Srebrenica massacre: most of the Bosnian Muslim victims were fighters, not civilians only one of 1, bodies in the graves around Srebrenica was identified as female. She provides no details on the impressively ruthless Croatian actions, such as: "UN troops watched horrified as Croat soldiers dragged the bodies of dead Serbs along the road outside the UN compound and then pumped them full of rounds from the AKs. They then crushed the bullet-ridden bodies under the tracks of a tank.
- Search form;
- Michael Mandel.
The double standard, based in good part on misrepresentation of the facts, is gross. Del Ponte notes that Croatian General Ante Gotovina was indicted in for war crimes in Operation Storm, but a number of questions arise: Why did it take six years after the event for Gotovina to be indicted, whereas Bosnian Serb General Mladic and President Karadzic were indicted within days of the Srebrenica massacre and before the facts of the case could be minimally verified?
Could this indictment have been connected to the seizure of Milosevic and the need to give the appearance of balance? Why was Croat President Tudjman not indicted for these war crimes, in parallel with Milosevic who the ICTY has striven mightily and unsuccessfully to link to the Srebrenica massacre, whereas Tudjman's link to Operation Storm is clear?
Why were Clinton, Albright and Holbrooke not indicted for documentable approval and support for Operation Storm? A key theme in Del Ponte's speech was the importance of "justice" for bringing reconciliation to the area. This principle is not applied in cases like Indonesia in East Timor, where a U.
Related How America Gets Away With Murder: Illegal Wars, Collateral Damage and Crimes Against Humanity
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved